Bookses! Glorious bookses!

[penmage]

Good morning! It's a beautiful day! Spring has finally arrived, and it's glorious! Oh, but I love the city in the Spring (well, I love the city in all seasons. But in the spring it's especially wonderful.)

I went to the library this morning to pick up all those glorious distractions sometimes known as books. I've now got Abarat by Clive Barker, A Fistful of Sky by Nina Kiriki Hoffman, A Wizard Alone by Diane Duane (woohoo!), The Graveyard Game by Kage Baker (yes, yet another Mendoza book. I can't help it! They're addictive!), A Scattering of Jades by Alexander C. Irvine (This I'd never heard of before - I picked it up on whim. Anyone read it?), The Princes in the Tower by Alison Weir (for the other side of the Richard III discussions), and the crowning glory, Kushiel's Avatar by Jacqueline Carey (wooohooo!).

And no time to read, of course.

I've got to get a move on and read The Princes in the Tower so I can debate Prof. Pahmer on the subject/give it to him to read. It scares me, though - I was very convinced of the innocence of Richard III by The Daughter of Time, and I can see that this book is rather convincing in the other direction.

I'm happily prepared to read both and see what comes out of it, but at the same time - does anyone know of any good books defending Richard III? (aside from Josephine Tey's Daughter of Time.)

And now, to edit some stories.

Comments

[penmage.livejournal.com]

Thanks. I'm not exactly looking for a bias in either direction, just balance, really. Have you read The Princes in the Tower? I've started it, and I'm distinctly underwhelmed so far, though there's always the chance that it will improve.

The subject fascinates me - I'm started to crave books on either side. I'm definitly going to look for the Peters book.